Ting/Jostoph
Watch
2
0
Fork
You've already forked Jostoph
 2
Code Issues 57 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Session: Independent Forge identity lifecycle audit and reconciliation #103

New issue
Open
opened 2026-08-29 17:05:03 +00:00 by larandar · 1 comment
larandar commented 2026-08-29 17:05:03 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Proposal

Deliver Jostoph's independent lifecycle audit contract, ingestion, correlation, resilience, drift detection, and acceptance report as one coherent PR review.

Design

Jostoph observes authenticated non-secret events from every lifecycle layer. It preserves each component's own outcome, correlates by stable identifiers, and reports missing or contradictory evidence. It never authorizes a grant, mints or invalidates a credential, copies success between components, or holds bearer material.

Session size is the PR-review question: this contract, implementation, and evidence fit one review. The six leaves are a decomposition aid, not an inner-unit quota.

Delivery map

  • #104 defines the canonical envelope.
  • #106 authenticates, validates, and appends events.
  • #107 materializes the correlation view.
  • #108 proves replay, duplicate, restart, and quarantine behavior.
  • #105 detects C01-C08 lifecycle drift.
  • #109 renders production acceptance and old-path exit readiness.

Acceptance criteria

  • Every leaf is delivered with its own bounded tests and native ordering edge.
  • The correlated view and reports contain no credential material.
  • Missing or contradictory evidence can never become synthesized success.
  • flake-ops can consume the acceptance report for its production proof.

Specification Delta

This refinement splits the two broad children into six leaf-sized delivery units while retaining one Session PR boundary.

OpenSpec

OpenSpec 103 — Forge identity lifecycle audit

## Proposal Deliver Jostoph's independent lifecycle audit contract, ingestion, correlation, resilience, drift detection, and acceptance report as one coherent PR review. ## Design Jostoph observes authenticated non-secret events from every lifecycle layer. It preserves each component's own outcome, correlates by stable identifiers, and reports missing or contradictory evidence. It never authorizes a grant, mints or invalidates a credential, copies success between components, or holds bearer material. Session size is the PR-review question: this contract, implementation, and evidence fit one review. The six leaves are a decomposition aid, not an inner-unit quota. ## Delivery map - #104 defines the canonical envelope. - #106 authenticates, validates, and appends events. - #107 materializes the correlation view. - #108 proves replay, duplicate, restart, and quarantine behavior. - #105 detects C01-C08 lifecycle drift. - #109 renders production acceptance and old-path exit readiness. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Every leaf is delivered with its own bounded tests and native ordering edge. - [ ] The correlated view and reports contain no credential material. - [ ] Missing or contradictory evidence can never become synthesized success. - [ ] flake-ops can consume the acceptance report for its production proof. ## Specification Delta This refinement splits the two broad children into six leaf-sized delivery units while retaining one Session PR boundary. ## OpenSpec [OpenSpec 103 — Forge identity lifecycle audit](https://jo.et0.pw/Ting/Jostoph/wiki/OpenSpec-103-forge-identity-lifecycle-audit)
larandar commented 2026-09-20 03:46:30 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closure is gated on #109. #103 closes when #109 closes; do not force closure while the narrowed residual record remains open. Audit G13.

<!-- larandar:groom:v1 --> Closure is gated on #109. #103 closes when #109 closes; do not force closure while the narrowed residual record remains open. Audit G13.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
fastlane
tango/103-lifecycle-audit
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels
  
Compat/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug
Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation
Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature
New functionality

  
Kind/Security
This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing
Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Meta/Campaign
Campaign grouping node; dependencies name its direct Epics

  
Meta/Epic
Epic grouping node; dependencies name its direct Sessions

  
Meta/Session
Session delivery bundle; dependencies name its direct leaf issues

  
Priority/Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority/High
The priority is high

  
Priority/Low
The priority is low

  
Priority/Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed/Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed/Curated
PR LABEL: merge by rebase/ff to preserve the commit line; absence means squash. Set by the AUTHOR. (Curation itself is a duty on every PR — the label only picks the merge style.)

  
Reviewed/Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed/Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed/Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Scope/Campaign
Umbrella issue grouping a coherent multi-issue campaign.

  
Status/Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status/Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status/Conflicted
STATE: steward rebase failed; work returned to its agent, with evidence.

  
Status/In Progress
STATE: claimed, workspace active. Exactly one assignee, or none when idle.

  
Status/In Review
STATE: PR open against fastlane. Set by steward (PR webhook).

  
Status/Need Grooming
Issue body and comments do not yet conform to the Deliverable record; grooming required.

  
Status/Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
Status/Ready
Ready for execution; no known blocker prevents useful work from starting.

No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Meta/Campaign
Meta/Epic
Meta/Session
Priority/Critical
Priority/High
Priority/Low
Priority/Medium
Reviewed/Confirmed
Reviewed/Curated
Reviewed/Duplicate
Reviewed/Invalid
Reviewed/Won't Fix
Scope/Campaign
Status/Abandoned
Status/Blocked
Status/Conflicted
Status/In Progress
Status/In Review
Status/Need Grooming
Status/Need More Info
Status/Ready
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Blocks
#60 Epic: Forge identity lifecycle — OpenBao leases, Vedanta effect, Kanidm credentials
Ting/Ting
#84 Epic: Vedanta ceremony and custody governance
Ting/Jostoph
#116 Epic: Jostoph estate-wide toolchain lock
Ting/Jostoph
You do not have permission to read 1 dependency
Depends on
#61 Session: Ratify and reconcile the Forge identity lifecycle contract
Ting/Ting
#104 Define the canonical lifecycle audit envelope
Ting/Jostoph
#105 Detect canonical lifecycle drift C01-C08
Ting/Jostoph
#106 Authenticate and append lifecycle events
Ting/Jostoph
#107 Materialize the lifecycle correlation view
Ting/Jostoph
#108 Prove lifecycle replay, duplicate, restart, and quarantine behavior
Ting/Jostoph
#109 Render production acceptance and old-path exit readiness
Ting/Jostoph
Reference
Ting/Jostoph#103
No description provided.