OD-7: consistency watermark — render from a stale identified generation, or defer #40
Labels
No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Meta/Campaign
Meta/Epic
Meta/Session
Priority/Critical
Priority/High
Priority/Low
Priority/Medium
Reviewed/Confirmed
Reviewed/Curated
Reviewed/Duplicate
Reviewed/Invalid
Reviewed/Won't Fix
Scope/Campaign
Status/Abandoned
Status/Blocked
Status/Conflicted
Status/In Progress
Status/In Review
Status/Need Grooming
Status/Need More Info
Status/Ready
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
#28 Slice 2 — persistent facts in HydraMem
Ting/CurryComb
#41 Rule: the seven open design decisions
Ting/CurryComb
Reference
Ting/CurryComb#40
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Question
May CurryComb render effects from a stale but identified HydraMem generation, or must it defer effects until the requested Forgejo revision is projected?
Where this already lives
docs/handoff.md§Open decisions 7, §Failure behavior ("Mnestic projection stale — serve the published generation with its watermark or wait by policy; never present it as current without the watermark"); ADR-0001 §Open decisions; ADR-0002 §not-settled.Decision procedure
Rule per effect class (canonical render vs label mutations vs question asks), or set one global policy; ADR append. The watermark is already shipped as data by #2 — this decides what the reconciler may do with it.
Unblocks
#2 consumption policy; #28 reconciler behavior; stale-state paths in #29.
Grooming state: Open — owner ruling required.
Evidence: Related mentions:
docs/handoff.md§Open decisions 7, §Failure behavior (stale-projection row); ADR-0001 §Open decisions; ADR-0002 §not-settled. The watermark ships as data in #2; this rules reconciler behavior in #28 and stale paths in #29.Larandar: Decision required.
Question: Project the complete authority, acceptance, and ownership question for this Session.
Decision procedure: State the decision procedure, including the evidence needed to accept or reject the projected work; do not promise a future replacement.
Consumers: Name every Session or repository that consumes the result and the gate edge each consumer relies on.
Sources: CurryComb#40 body, its authoritative contract records, and the relevant audit evidence.
State: This comment is the current projection of the full question, procedure, consumers, and sources. Audit G43, grooming audit 2026-09-19/20.