OD-4: question syntax — markers, commands, reactions, or prose plus explicit ratification #37

Open
opened 2026-09-02 07:55:45 +00:00 by larandar · 2 comments
Owner

Question

How does a human answer a typed CurryComb question: comment markers, slash-commands, reactions, or plain prose that only becomes an answer through explicit ratification?

Where this already lives

docs/handoff.md §Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 §not-settled (irrelevant to Slice 1, arrives with Slice 4).

Decision procedure

Pick the syntax and its authority model in one ADR append. The admission pipeline is deliberately parser-pluggable; the parser is the only seam this rules.

Unblocks

#13's answer parser; the canonical-comment question rendering in #10.

## Question How does a human *answer* a typed CurryComb question: comment markers, slash-commands, reactions, or plain prose that only becomes an answer through explicit ratification? ## Where this already lives `docs/handoff.md` §Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 §not-settled (irrelevant to Slice 1, arrives with Slice 4). ## Decision procedure Pick the syntax and its authority model in one ADR append. The admission pipeline is deliberately parser-pluggable; the parser is the only seam this rules. ## Unblocks #13's answer parser; the canonical-comment question rendering in #10.
Author
Owner

Grooming state: Open — owner ruling required.
Evidence: Related mentions: docs/handoff.md §Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 §not-settled (question syntax, arrives with Slice 4). The seam this rules is the answer parser in #13 and question rendering in #10.
Larandar: Decision required.

<!-- larandar:groom:v1 --> **Grooming state:** Open — owner ruling required. **Evidence:** Related mentions: `docs/handoff.md` §Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 §not-settled (question syntax, arrives with Slice 4). The seam this rules is the answer parser in #13 and question rendering in #10. **Larandar:** Decision required.
Author
Owner

Question: How does a human answer a typed CurryComb question: markers, slash commands, reactions, or prose that becomes an answer only through explicit ratification?
Decision procedure: Select the syntax and authority model in one ADR append; the admission pipeline stays parser-pluggable and the parser is the ruled seam.
Consumers: #13 answer parser and #10 canonical-comment question rendering.
Sources: CurryComb#37 body; docs/handoff.md Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 not-settled; audit 2026-09-19/20 G43.
State: The issue body remains the full record; this comment is the current projection, not a promise of future replacement.

<!-- currycomb:refinement:v1 repo=Ting/CurryComb issue=37 --> **Question:** How does a human answer a typed CurryComb question: markers, slash commands, reactions, or prose that becomes an answer only through explicit ratification? **Decision procedure:** Select the syntax and authority model in one ADR append; the admission pipeline stays parser-pluggable and the parser is the ruled seam. **Consumers:** #13 answer parser and #10 canonical-comment question rendering. **Sources:** CurryComb#37 body; docs/handoff.md Open decisions 4; ADR-0002 not-settled; audit 2026-09-19/20 G43. **State:** The issue body remains the full record; this comment is the current projection, not a promise of future replacement.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
Ting/CurryComb#37
No description provided.