OD-3: curation authority — who may ratify estate, repository, and policy facts #36

Open
opened 2026-09-02 07:55:45 +00:00 by larandar · 2 comments
Owner

Question

Which Forgejo actors or HydraMem identities may ratify estate-wide facts, repository-local facts, and policy facts — and under what review process?

Where this already lives

docs/handoff.md §Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 §Open decisions (curation authority, "under what review process"). Ratification law 11 (PR author ≠ approver) is the nearest existing precedent.

Decision procedure

A table: fact scope × authorized identity × required review, appended as an ADR. #13 and #18 enforce exactly this table at admission.

Unblocks

#13 authority checks; #18 admission gating; #30.

## Question Which Forgejo actors or HydraMem identities may ratify estate-wide facts, repository-local facts, and policy facts — and under what review process? ## Where this already lives `docs/handoff.md` §Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 §Open decisions (curation authority, "under what review process"). Ratification law 11 (PR author ≠ approver) is the nearest existing precedent. ## Decision procedure A table: fact scope × authorized identity × required review, appended as an ADR. #13 and #18 enforce exactly this table at admission. ## Unblocks #13 authority checks; #18 admission gating; #30.
Author
Owner

Grooming state: Open — owner ruling required.
Evidence: Related mentions: docs/handoff.md §Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 §Open decisions (curation authority, review process); Ratification law 11 as nearest precedent. Enforcing consumers: #13, #18; gated session #30.
Larandar: Decision required.

<!-- larandar:groom:v1 --> **Grooming state:** Open — owner ruling required. **Evidence:** Related mentions: `docs/handoff.md` §Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 §Open decisions (curation authority, review process); Ratification law 11 as nearest precedent. Enforcing consumers: #13, #18; gated session #30. **Larandar:** Decision required.
Author
Owner

Question: Which Forgejo actors or HydraMem identities may ratify estate-wide, repository-local, and policy facts, and under what review process?
Decision procedure: Append a table of fact scope, authorized identity, and required review to an ADR; #13 and #18 enforce the resulting table at admission.
Consumers: #13 authority checks, #18 admission gating, and #30.
Sources: CurryComb#36 body; docs/handoff.md Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 curation authority; Ratification law 11; audit 2026-09-19/20 G43.
State: The issue body remains the full record; this comment is the current projection, not a promise of future replacement.

<!-- currycomb:refinement:v1 repo=Ting/CurryComb issue=36 --> **Question:** Which Forgejo actors or HydraMem identities may ratify estate-wide, repository-local, and policy facts, and under what review process? **Decision procedure:** Append a table of fact scope, authorized identity, and required review to an ADR; #13 and #18 enforce the resulting table at admission. **Consumers:** #13 authority checks, #18 admission gating, and #30. **Sources:** CurryComb#36 body; docs/handoff.md Open decisions 3; ADR-0001 curation authority; Ratification law 11; audit 2026-09-19/20 G43. **State:** The issue body remains the full record; this comment is the current projection, not a promise of future replacement.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
Ting/CurryComb#36
No description provided.