Distribute governed issue and PR templates with explicit repository exceptions #122

New issue

Open

opened 2026-09-07 06:09:12 +00:00 by larandar · 0 comments

larandar commented

2026-09-07 06:09:12 +00:00

Owner

Proposal

Separate the governed template distribution obligation from label reconciliation in #87. Ensure participating repositories in Ting, lar.ad, and swarm receive the current Campaign, Epic, Session, Deliverable, and PR delivery templates unless an explicit repository exception applies.

Design

Reuse the canonical definitions owned by Ting/Ting#29 and the current Ting/contracts schema/template authority. Record the template revision and repository exception. Jostoph reports missing, stale, or unauthorisedly altered templates; it does not overwrite tracked repository content automatically. Distribution is a deliberate repository-local reviewed change.

Tasks and acceptance

Resolve the canonical template set and immutable revision.
Inventory participating repositories and explicit exceptions before proposing changes.
Provide a repeatable distribution/update path that preserves repository-local changes unless their replacement is explicitly authorized.
Given a missing, stale, or altered template, when conformance runs, then it emits a finding and leaves tracked content intact.
Given an approved distribution change, when that repository's checks run, then all five governed templates match the selected contract or their explicit exception.
Retain per-repository revision and review/check evidence.

Boundary

Definition/law changes remain Ting/Ting#29; organisation labels remain #87; hierarchy diagnostics have their own owner. This record does not authorize an automatic estate-wide content overwrite. The exact parent Epic is undeclared; #87 is a scope origin, not a structural parent.

Provenance and delivery state

Larandar approved the split in estate-backlog-rationalization.md on 2026-09-07. Scope source: Ting/Jostoph#87. Contradiction ledger: Ting/Ting#28.

The current normative store is Ting/contracts. The exact applicable change, immutable commit, and selected requirement/scenario binding remain to be verified and recorded; this issue remains Status/Need Grooming and is not newly marked Ready. This tracker split is not implementation or deployment evidence.

## Proposal Separate the governed template distribution obligation from label reconciliation in #87. Ensure participating repositories in Ting, lar.ad, and swarm receive the current Campaign, Epic, Session, Deliverable, and PR delivery templates unless an explicit repository exception applies. ## Design Reuse the canonical definitions owned by [Ting/Ting#29](https://jo.et0.pw/Ting/Ting/issues/29) and the current Ting/contracts schema/template authority. Record the template revision and repository exception. Jostoph reports missing, stale, or unauthorisedly altered templates; it does not overwrite tracked repository content automatically. Distribution is a deliberate repository-local reviewed change. ## Tasks and acceptance - [ ] Resolve the canonical template set and immutable revision. - [ ] Inventory participating repositories and explicit exceptions before proposing changes. - [ ] Provide a repeatable distribution/update path that preserves repository-local changes unless their replacement is explicitly authorized. - [ ] Given a missing, stale, or altered template, when conformance runs, then it emits a finding and leaves tracked content intact. - [ ] Given an approved distribution change, when that repository's checks run, then all five governed templates match the selected contract or their explicit exception. - [ ] Retain per-repository revision and review/check evidence. ## Boundary Definition/law changes remain Ting/Ting#29; organisation labels remain #87; hierarchy diagnostics have their own owner. This record does not authorize an automatic estate-wide content overwrite. The exact parent Epic is undeclared; #87 is a scope origin, not a structural parent. ## Provenance and delivery state Larandar approved the split in estate-backlog-rationalization.md on 2026-09-07. Scope source: [Ting/Jostoph#87](https://jo.et0.pw/Ting/Jostoph/issues/87). Contradiction ledger: [Ting/Ting#28](https://jo.et0.pw/Ting/Ting/issues/28). The current normative store is Ting/contracts. The exact applicable change, immutable commit, and selected requirement/scenario binding remain to be verified and recorded; this issue remains Status/Need Grooming and is not newly marked Ready. This tracker split is not implementation or deployment evidence.

larandar added the

Kind/Feature

Status/Need Grooming

labels

2026-09-07 06:09:12 +00:00

larandar referenced this issue

2026-09-07 06:09:42 +00:00

Reconcile ratified organisation labels without deletion #87

larandar referenced this issue

2026-09-07 06:10:53 +00:00

Reconcile ratified organisation labels without deletion #87